Two Investment Banks Want Out of 20-year-old Settlement

The $1.5 billion settlement with 12 investment banks addressed a scandal over analysts issuing positive research to win business.

|

Piper Sandler and Stifel Financial on Wednesday asked a judge to free them from “onerous” restrictions from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s global settlement more than two decades ago with 12 investment banks over analyst conflicts.

The $1.5 billion settlement in 2003 and 2004 addressed a scandal over analysts issuing positive research to help Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, the defunct Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, and others win investment banking business.

Piper, Stifel Say Treatment Isn’t Fair

In a filing in Manhattan federal court, Piper and Stifel said they should not be bound to requirements in a related consent decree, including having to build “firewalls” between research and investment banking, while nearly all rivals are held to looser standards the SEC approved in 2015.

Piper and Stifel said the disparate treatment makes it harder to compete with other middle-market banks, as well as large banks that are bound by the settlement but have much larger client bases and are better known globally.

Hurts the Public Interest

They also said the decree hurts the public interest because research may have different protections depending on which bank issued it, and smaller companies may struggle to raise capital because compliance costs mean some banks cannot afford to provide research coverage.

“The consent decree has achieved its purpose,” Piper and Stifel said.

An SEC spokesperson declined to comment.

Piper is based in Minneapolis, and Stifel is based in St. Louis. They are the respective successors to US Bancorp Piper Jaffray and Thomas Weisel Partners, the smallest investment banks in the SEC settlement.

Driven by Spitzer

The settlement had been engineered mainly by former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, addressing alleged conflicts by analysts like Citigroup’s Jack Grubman and Merrill Lynch’s Henry Blodget.

The cases are SEC v US Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 03-02942; and SEC v Thomas Weisel Partners LLC in the same court, No. 04-06910.

This article was provided by Reuters.

Latest News

See all >>

As Texas Targets Flood Scammers, SEC Offers Tips to Avoid Being Duped

Scammers seek to fleece disaster victims and those who want to help, officials warn.

Retirement Dreams Delayed, Altered or Canceled for 40% of Pre-Retirees

Many no longer have faith in traditional rules of thumb of retirement planning, a Nationwide survey reveals.

From Sports Greats to Pop Icons, Some Celebs Reap Huge Returns

A new analysis by BrokerChooser ranks the world's most successful celebrity investors.

Tariff Volatility Drives Investors to Actively Managed Funds

Analysts say active managers focused on three factors may lead them to outperform the broader market in the months ahead.

Georgia Ponzi Scheme Duped 300 Investors Out of $140M, SEC Alleges

First Liberty Building & Loan started by making bridge loans to businesses but switched to a scam, investigators say.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Offers Opportunities for Advisors, Investors

Financial advisors need to understand these changes to serve their wealthy clients properly.