BlackRock Too Green for Texas

Under a new Texas law finalized last year, state agencies must divest from financial companies identified by Hegar as boycotting energy stock.

By Ross Kerber & Pete Schroeder

Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar has flagged BlackRock Inc. as a company whose stance on boycotting oil and gas stocks could trigger divestment by public agencies.

Hegar left other Wall Street investment firms off a list he released in August. But top banks like Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase & Co may not get so lucky next time as politicians in other conservative states weigh how to treat companies they say have let progressive, or “woke,” values get in the way of financial decisions. Many investors and executives worry they are being forced to pick sides in a culture war.

Under a new Texas law finalized last year, state agencies must divest from financial companies identified by Hegar as boycotting energy stocks, or explain why they are continuing those relationships. In practice, the law could mean the loss of pension-management contracts.

Much of Wall Street has adopted new environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria for some companies whose shares they hold as investors put more cash into sustainable funds.

The trend has pleased officials investing money in Democratic-led states but rankled Republican leaders in other places like Texas and West Virginia where fossil fuel companies are big employers.

Climate change and lending decisions

Wall Street banks fielded queries from Hegar earlier this year over how their stance on climate change influences their lending decisions. But the list ultimately focused mainly on European firms that are not among top lenders to the fossil fuel industry.

Hegar did list many individual funds from a wide range of U.S. sponsors, but their parent companies were not listed and so remain free to continue doing business in the Lone Star State.

“Some of Wall Street might take this as a win because they weren’t listed at the entity level,” said Clifford Chance attorney Vadim Avdeychik, who advises asset managers. “I think those asset managers would be relieved.”

More political pressure on BlackRock

Hegar’s listing of BlackRock sets the stage for more political pressure on the $8.5 trillion asset manager although it remains a major investor in top oil, gas and coal companies. Its CEO Laurence Fink is well-known for annual letters to CEOs stressing themes like climate change and has drawn attacks from conservatives.

BlackRock Chief Client Officer Mark McCombe said the company will work to leave the list and that clauses within the new law should allow it to keep current business in the state.

Other Wall Street giants could also face scrutiny, said Michael Rosen, chief investment officer for Angeles Investments.

“You made your point with attacking BlackRock and the European firms, so then who is the next bogeyman you have to go after?”

Action in conservative states

This year there are around 44 bills or new laws in 17 conservative-led states that would penalize corporations for ESG factors or other social policies, up sharply from roughly a dozen such measures last year, Reuters reported last month.

One big U.S. bank executive, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said he was not optimistic that other Republican-led states would go so easy on Wall Street, since state laws differ and such decisions seem political rather than technical.

Last month, West Virginia banned JPMorgan and Wells Fargo, among others, from new state business for boycotting fossil-fuel companies, an allegation the banks deny.

“We believe that we’re in compliance with all these laws, but how that’s interpreted can be based on the political winds,” said the executive.

‘Breathing Document’

In an interview with Reuters, Hegar said his office screened the 10 companies listed on criteria such as pledges to investor groups to reduce emissions from portfolio companies. He did not go into details about the differences between listed and non-listed companies.

Hegar cautioned that the list could be updated quarterly and more companies could be added. “This is a living, breathing document that will be reviewed on a continuing basis,” he said.

Texas agencies must now assess if they will divest from the listed firms, based on factors like fiduciary considerations. A representative for the $200 billion Teacher Retirement System, the largest public fund in Texas, said it is reviewing the list.

McCombe said BlackRock’s listing could hurt pensioners and undercuts Texas’ business-friendly message.

“When one company is singled out the impression it gives is, who is safe investing in Texas?” McCombe said.

Andrew Poreda, senior research analyst at Sage Advisory Services, a Texas-based investment manager, said other big U.S. financial companies were lucky to escape Hegar’s list, as many also have taken steps to address climate change.

As the U.S. divides politically, it becomes more likely companies will be forced to pick as side, he said, which will disrupt their operations.

“We should find ways to cool things down,” he added.

This article was provided by Reuters.

Latest news

Study Reveals Insight into Affluent American Investors’ Mindsets

Key findings of the study include a noticeable decrease in financial security among affluent Americans.

Did ETF Investors Profit from Hamas Attack?

A U.S. professor stands by his research showing there was a spike in short selling of an Israel ETF leading up to the attacks. The Tel Aviv exchange says the research is inaccurate.

Ex-Wells Fargo CEO Sues Bank For $34 Million In Withheld Pay, Stock

The former CEO says the bank canceled stock awards and withheld a bonus he had earned before stepping down.

Black Swan Fears Drive Caution, Plus 60/40 Three-Decade Performance

VIX sees record trading as looming economic and geopolitical risks keep investors cautious about a potential return of volatility.

Carson Group: Still Too Few Women in Wealth Management

Its latest report confirms the industry has made little progress in gender diversity despite a lot of talk.

Supreme Court Seems Wary of SEC’s In-House Tribunals Without Juries

The Supreme Court discussed a case involving a hedge fund manager in which the SEC brought a civil enforcement proceeding that charged he mislead investors.